netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 06/14] net: phy: Introduce generic SFP handling for PHY drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6159237.lOV4Wx5bFT@fw-rgant>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 09:28:11 +0200
From: Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@...tlin.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
 Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
 Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
 Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
 Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
 Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
 Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
 Nicolò Veronese <nicveronese@...il.com>,
 Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, mwojtas@...omium.org,
 Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
 Dimitri Fedrau <dimitri.fedrau@...bherr.com>
Subject:
 Re: [PATCH net-next v6 06/14] net: phy: Introduce generic SFP handling for
 PHY drivers

On Thursday, 29 May 2025 15:23:22 CEST Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 09:35:35AM +0200, Romain Gantois wrote:
> > > In that regard, you can consider 1000BaseX as a MII mode (we do have
> > > PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX).
> > 
> > Ugh, the "1000BaseX" terminology never ceases to confuse me, but yes
> > you're
> > right.
> 
> 1000BASE-X is exactly what is described in IEEE 802.3. It's a PHY
> interface mode because PHYs that use SerDes can connect to the host
> using SGMII or 1000BASE-X over the serial link.
> 
> 1000BASE-X's purpose in IEEE 802.3 is as a protocol for use over
> fibre links, as the basis for 1000BASE-SX, 1000BASE-LX, 1000BASE-EX
> etc where the S, L, E etc are all to do with the properties of the
> medium that the electrical 1000BASE-X is sent over. It even includes
> 1000BASE-CX which is over copper cable.

Ah makes sense, thanks for the explanation. I guess my mistake was assuming 
that MAC/PHY interface modes were necessarily strictly at the reconciliation 
sublayer level, and didn't include PCS/PMA functions.

Thanks,

-- 
Romain Gantois, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)