[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250602050949.GA21943@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 07:09:49 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>
Cc: hch@....de, axboe@...nel.dk, chuck.lever@...cle.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, horms@...nel.org,
jaka@...ux.ibm.com, jlayton@...nel.org, kbusch@...nel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, kuniyu@...zon.com, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
matttbe@...nel.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, sfrench@...ba.org, wenjia@...ux.ibm.com,
willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 6/7] socket: Replace most sock_create()
calls with sock_create_kern().
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 08:03:06PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> I actually tried to to do so as sock_create_user() in the
> previous series but was advised to avoid rename as the benefit
> against LoC was low.
I can't really parse this. What is the 'benefit against LoC'?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists