netdev - Re: [PATCH] mac802154_hwsim: allow users to specify the number of simulated radios dinamically instead of the previously hardcoded value of 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54980160-6e46-4ac4-b87f-41b7dccba1d3@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 21:22:43 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ramon Fontes <ramonreisfontes@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org,
	alex.aring@...il.com, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac802154_hwsim: allow users to specify the number of
 simulated radios dinamically instead of the previously hardcoded value of 2

On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 02:54:57PM -0300, Ramon Fontes wrote:
> > handle as unsigned then this check would not be necessary?
> 
> Yeah, it does make sense. However, I have a bit of an embarrassing
> question. How do I submit an updated patch in this same thread?

You don't. You should submit a new patchset, as a new thread.

The CI tooling works on one patchset per thread, and if you deviate
from that, the CI won't test it. And if it is not tested, it is pretty
much an automatic reject.

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html

It is also the merge windows right now, so anything you post will get
rejected anyway, so please post as RFC.

	Andrew