netdev - Re: [PATCH] ptp: remove unnecessary brace in ptp_clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250609124215.204c9c41@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 12:42:15 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@...il.com>
Cc: richardcochran@...il.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp: remove unnecessary brace in ptp_clock_unregister()

On Fri,  6 Jun 2025 19:36:59 +0900 Jeongjun Park wrote:
> There are unnecessary brace used in the conditional statement where
> ptp_vclock_in_use() is used in ptp_clock_unregister(). This should be
> removed.

Quoting documentation:

  Clean-up patches
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  
  Netdev discourages patches which perform simple clean-ups, which are not in
  the context of other work. For example:
  
  * Addressing ``checkpatch.pl`` warnings
  * Addressing :ref:`Local variable ordering<rcs>` issues
  * Conversions to device-managed APIs (``devm_`` helpers)
  
  This is because it is felt that the churn that such changes produce comes
  at a greater cost than the value of such clean-ups.
  
  Conversely, spelling and grammar fixes are not discouraged.
  
See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#clean-up-patches
-- 
pw-bot: reject