netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix RCU usage in bpf_get_cgroup_classid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wm9jy623.fsf@posteo.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:23:00 +0000
From: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@...teo.net>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,  "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>,  Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,  Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,  Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,  Simon
 Horman <horms@...nel.org>,  Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,  John
 Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,  Alexei Starovoitov
 <ast@...nel.org>,  Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,  Eduard Zingerman
 <eddyz87@...il.com>,  Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,  Yonghong Song
 <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,  KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,  Stanislav
 Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,  Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,  Jiri Olsa
 <jolsa@...nel.org>,  Feng Yang <yangfeng@...inos.cn>,  Tejun Heo
 <tj@...nel.org>,  Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,  LKML
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,  bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
  syzbot+b4169a1cfb945d2ed0ec@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix RCU usage in
 bpf_get_cgroup_classid_curr helper

Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> writes:

> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 5:58 AM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/9/25 5:51 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jun 8, 2025 at 8:35 AM Charalampos Mitrodimas
>> > <charmitro@...teo.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The commit ee971630f20f ("bpf: Allow some trace helpers for all prog
>> >> types") made bpf_get_cgroup_classid_curr helper available to all BPF
>> >> program types.  This helper used __task_get_classid() which calls
>> >> task_cls_state() that requires rcu_read_lock_bh_held().
>> >>
>> >> This triggers an RCU warning when called from BPF syscall programs
>> >> which run under rcu_read_lock_trace():
>> >>
>> >>    WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
>> >>    6.15.0-rc4-syzkaller-g079e5c56a5c4 #0 Not tainted
>> >>    -----------------------------
>> >>    net/core/netclassid_cgroup.c:24 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>> >>
>> >> Fix this by replacing __task_get_classid() with task_cls_classid()
>> >> which handles RCU locking internally using regular rcu_read_lock() and
>> >> is safe to call from any context.
>> >>
>> >> Reported-by: syzbot+b4169a1cfb945d2ed0ec@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>> >> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b4169a1cfb945d2ed0ec
>> >> Fixes: ee971630f20f ("bpf: Allow some trace helpers for all prog types")
>> >> Signed-off-by: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@...teo.net>
>> >> ---
>> >>   net/core/filter.c | 2 +-
>> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
>> >> index 30e7d36790883b29174654315738e93237e21dd0..3b3f81cf674dde7d2bd83488450edad4e129bdac 100644
>> >> --- a/net/core/filter.c
>> >> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
>> >> @@ -3083,7 +3083,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_msg_pop_data_proto = {
>> >>   #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_NET_CLASSID
>> >>   BPF_CALL_0(bpf_get_cgroup_classid_curr)
>> >>   {
>> >> -       return __task_get_classid(current);
>> >> +       return task_cls_classid(current);
>> >>   }
>> >
>> > Daniel added this helper in
>> > commit 5a52ae4e32a6 ("bpf: Allow to retrieve cgroup v1 classid from v2 hooks")
>> > with intention to use it from networking hooks.
>> >
>> > But task_cls_classid() has
>> >          if (in_interrupt())
>> >                  return 0;
>> >
>> > which will trigger in softirq and tc hooks.
>> > So this might break Daniel's use case.
>>
>> Yeap, we cannot break tc(x) BPF programs. It probably makes sense to have
>> a new helper implementation for the more generic, non-networking case which
>> then internally uses task_cls_classid().
>
> Instead of forking the helper I think we can :
> rcu_read_lock_bh_held() || rcu_read_lock_held()
> in task_cls_state().

I tested your suggestion with,

  rcu_read_lock_bh_held() || rcu_read_lock_held()

but it still triggers the RCU warning because BPF syscall programs use
rcu_read_lock_trace().

Adding rcu_read_lock_trace_held() fixes it functionally but triggers a
checkpatch warning:

  WARNING: use of RCU tasks trace is incorrect outside BPF or core RCU code

I think the best solution here would be to add
local_bh_disable()/enable() protection directly in the BPF helper. This
keeps the fix localized to where the problem exists, and avoids
modifying core cgroup RCU.

> And that will do it.