[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ktsjjdsvbyf6loaa5nnyotzdc4wenshcwwqnzm7txvv2n3dhgl@76qg4ynjzjuj>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:42:48 +0000
From: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@...el.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, "Jani
Nikula" <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Joonas Lahtinen
<joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 3/9] ref_tracker: have callers pass output function
to pr_ostream()
Hi Jeff,
> In a later patch, we'll be adding a 3rd mechanism for outputting
> ref_tracker info via seq_file. Instead of a conditional, have the caller
> set a pointer to an output function in struct ostream. As part of this,
> the log prefix must be explicitly passed in, as it's too late for the
> pr_fmt macro.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> ---
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@...el.com>
Best Regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists