[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83e44167-43eb-4abd-b536-c2e290ab4382@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 18:38:57 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Khalid Mughal <khalid.mughal@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add new iccnet driver
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 08:54:02AM -0700, Khalid Mughal wrote:
> Intel(R) IPU ICCNET (Inter-Complex Communication Network) Driver:
>
> The iccnet (Inter-Core Communication Network) driver enables sideband
> channel communication between the Management-Complex and the
> Compute-Complex, both powered by ARMv8 CPUs, on the Intel IPU
> (Infrastructure Processing Unit). The driver establishes descriptor
> rings for transmission and reception using a shared memory region
> accessible to both CPU complexes. The TX ring of one CPU maps
> directly to the RX ring of the other CPU.
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg1000950.html
I suspect the developer was a student on a placement at TI for a
while, so it had the typical student code problems, and he had
problems thinking about the big picture, a generic solution rather
than a solution specific to TIs use case.
Please could you read through the comments i made to various versions
of that patchset and see what applies to what you are doing. Two
similar systems within a year suggests we need a generic shared memory
solution, or at least a shared core library which can then be wrapped
for individual use cases.
> v2:
> - Fixed issues highlighted by Marcin Szycik
> v3:
> - Fixed internal-kbuild-all build warning
> v4:
> - Changed iccnet header padding
As far as i know, these never made it to the list, so don't exist. It
is good it had internal review, but please don't pollute the commit
with stuff nobody else can see.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists