netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net_sched: sch_sfq: reject invalid perturb period

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <174974103999.4173578.3649013522414543337.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 15:10:39 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
 jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, gerrard.tai@...rlabs.sg,
 stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net_sched: sch_sfq: reject invalid perturb period

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:35:01 +0000 you wrote:
> Gerrard Tai reported that SFQ perturb_period has no range check yet,
> and this can be used to trigger a race condition fixed in a separate patch.
> 
> We want to make sure ctl->perturb_period * HZ will not overflow
> and is positive.
> 
> Tested:
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] net_sched: sch_sfq: reject invalid perturb period
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/7ca52541c05c

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html