netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests/tc-testing: sfq: check perturb timer values

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250614162528.GS414686@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 17:25:28 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests/tc-testing: sfq: check perturb timer
 values

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 06:41:36AM +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Add one test to check that the kernel rejects a negative perturb timer.
> 
> Add a second test checking that the kernel rejects
> a too big perturb timer.
> 
> All test results:
> 
> 1..2
> ok 1 cdc1 - Check that a negative perturb timer is rejected
> ok 2 a9f0 - Check that a too big perturb timer is rejected
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>