[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed6cd7a2e489e89352322f77af1ddd89@fw-web.de>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 14:02:20 +0200
From: "Frank Wunderlich (linux)" <linux@...web.de>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, Sean
Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David
S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Matthias
Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Frank Wunderlich
<frank-w@...lic-files.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: support named IRQs
Am 2025-06-15 12:13, schrieb Lorenzo Bianconi:
>> Am 2025-06-15 10:57, schrieb Lorenzo Bianconi:
>> > > From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
>> > >
>> > Hi Frank,
>> >
>> > I guess my comments on v1 apply even in v2. Can you please take a look?
>
> sure
:)
>> Am 2025-06-15 10:57, schrieb Lorenzo Bianconi:
>> > > From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
> I am fine to have it in a separate patch but I would prefer to have
> this patch
> in the same series, I think it is more clear.
I added changes for your and daniels comments to my repo (top 2
commits):
https://github.com/frank-w/BPI-Router-Linux/commits/6.16-mt7988upstream/
i would squash daniels suggestions in this patch here (MAX without __
and fixed
value of 3 to use for the loop - i guess this was intended for this
purpose) and
then the change for index in second patch.
>> > Same here, if you are not listing them in the device tree, you can
>> > remove them
>> > in the driver too (and adjust the code to keep the backward
>> > compatibility).
i plan to use named IRQs on mt7988 without the reserved ones (only rx+tx
+ RSS IRQs),
and loading not index based.
>> afaik i have no SHARED_INT board (only mt7621, mt7628) so changing the
>> index-logic will require testing on such boards too.
>
> I think the change will not heavily impact SHARED_INT devices.
I hope so ;)
> Regards,
> Lorenzo
regards Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists