lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ed6cd7a2e489e89352322f77af1ddd89@fw-web.de>
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 14:02:20 +0200
From: "Frank Wunderlich (linux)" <linux@...web.de>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, Sean
 Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David
 S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Matthias
 Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
 <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Frank Wunderlich
 <frank-w@...lic-files.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: support named IRQs

Am 2025-06-15 12:13, schrieb Lorenzo Bianconi:
>> Am 2025-06-15 10:57, schrieb Lorenzo Bianconi:
>> > > From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
>> > >
>> > Hi Frank,
>> >
>> > I guess my comments on v1 apply even in v2. Can you please take a look?
> 
> sure

:)

>> Am 2025-06-15 10:57, schrieb Lorenzo Bianconi:
>> > > From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>

> I am fine to have it in a separate patch but I would prefer to have 
> this patch
> in the same series, I think it is more clear.

I added changes for your and daniels comments to my repo (top 2 
commits):

https://github.com/frank-w/BPI-Router-Linux/commits/6.16-mt7988upstream/

i would squash daniels suggestions in this patch here (MAX without __ 
and fixed
value of 3 to use for the loop - i guess this was intended for this 
purpose) and
then the change for index in second patch.

>> > Same here, if you are not listing them in the device tree, you can
>> > remove them
>> > in the driver too (and adjust the code to keep the backward
>> > compatibility).

i plan to use named IRQs on mt7988 without the reserved ones (only rx+tx 
+ RSS IRQs),
and loading not index based.

>> afaik i have no SHARED_INT board (only mt7621, mt7628) so changing the
>> index-logic will require testing on such boards too.
> 
> I think the change will not heavily impact SHARED_INT devices.

I hope so ;)

> Regards,
> Lorenzo

regards Frank

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ