[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250616131548.GB4750@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 14:15:48 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: linux@...blig.org
Cc: mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, eperezma@...hat.com,
xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost: vringh: Remove unused functions
On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 12:07:31AM +0100, linux@...blig.org wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
>
> The functions:
> vringh_abandon_kern()
> vringh_abandon_user()
> vringh_iov_pull_kern() and
> vringh_iov_push_kern()
> were all added in 2013 by
> commit f87d0fbb5798 ("vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings.")
> but have remained unused.
>
> Remove them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@...blig.org>
Hi David,
With this patch (set) applied vlang flags the following.
So I guess that xfer_kern can be removed too.
.../vringh.c:887:19: warning: unused function 'xfer_kern' [-Wunused-function]
887 | static inline int xfer_kern(const struct vringh *vrh, void *src,
| ^~~~~~~~~
.../vringh.c:894:19: warning: unused function 'kern_xfer' [-Wunused-function]
894 | static inline int kern_xfer(const struct vringh *vrh, void *dst,
| ^~~~~~~~~
Otherwise this looks good to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists