[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250616152321.GD6918@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 16:23:21 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: qcom-ethqos: add
ethqos_pcs_set_inband()
On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 07:22:04PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 04:35:12PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 05:16:30PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > Add ethqos_pcs_set_inband() to improve readability, and to allow future
> > > changes when phylink PCS support is properly merged.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
> > > Tested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org> # sa8775p-ride-r3
> > > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> >
> > Thanks Russell,
> >
> > The nit below notwithstanding this looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> >
> > > ---
> > > .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-qcom-ethqos.c | 13 +++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-qcom-ethqos.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-qcom-ethqos.c
> > > index e30bdf72331a..2e398574c7a7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-qcom-ethqos.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-qcom-ethqos.c
> > > @@ -622,6 +622,11 @@ static void ethqos_set_serdes_speed(struct qcom_ethqos *ethqos, int speed)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void ethqos_pcs_set_inband(struct stmmac_priv *priv, bool enable)
> > > +{
> > > + stmmac_pcs_ctrl_ane(priv, priv->ioaddr, enable, 0, 0);
> >
> > FWIIW, I would have gone for the following, as all the type of
> > three of the trailing parameters is bool.
> >
> > stmmac_pcs_ctrl_ane(priv, priv->ioaddr, enable, false, false);
>
> So the original code:
>
> stmmac_pcs_ctrl_ane(priv, priv->ioaddr, 0, 0, 0);
> stmmac_pcs_ctrl_ane(priv, priv->ioaddr, 1, 0, 0);
> stmmac_pcs_ctrl_ane(priv, priv->ioaddr, 1, 0, 0);
> stmmac_pcs_ctrl_ane(priv, priv->ioaddr, 1, 0, 0);
>
> While one could convert the last two arguments to true/false, I'd prefer
> leaving them as is, as less change means less chance to introduce a bug.
Sure. No objections on my side.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists