[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65907669-80cb-4c79-9979-4bd2c159c0ed@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 17:37:01 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] net: timestamp: add helper returning skb's tx
tstamp
On 6/16/25 16:01, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> Add a helper function skb_get_tx_timestamp() that returns a tx timestamp
>> associated with an error queue skb.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/sock.h | 4 ++++
>> net/socket.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
>> index 92e7c1aae3cc..f5f5a9ad290b 100644
>> --- a/include/net/sock.h
>> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
>> @@ -2677,6 +2677,10 @@ void __sock_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
>> void __sock_recv_wifi_status(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
>> struct sk_buff *skb);
>>
>> +bool skb_has_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct sock *sk);
>> +int skb_get_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
>> + struct timespec64 *ts);
>> +
>> static inline void
>> sock_recv_timestamp(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> {
>> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
>> index 9a0e720f0859..2cab805943c0 100644
>> --- a/net/socket.c
>> +++ b/net/socket.c
>> @@ -843,6 +843,52 @@ static void put_ts_pktinfo(struct msghdr *msg, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> sizeof(ts_pktinfo), &ts_pktinfo);
>> }
>>
>> +bool skb_has_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct sock *sk)
>> +{
>
> I forgot to ask earlier, and not a reason for a respin.
>
> Is the only reason that skb is not const here skb_hwtstamps?
Yes, and also get_timestamp() for skb_get_tx_timestamp(). It's easy to patch,
but I was hoping we can merge it through the io_uring tree without deps on
net-next and add const to the new helpers after. It's definitely less trouble
than orchestrating a separate branch otherwise. FWIW, it'd be fine to add
const to the existing helpers in the meantime as long as the new functions
stay non-const for now. Hope that works
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists