[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<AS4PR04MB93863494863F595F74B12129E173A@AS4PR04MB9386.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 08:09:10 +0000
From: Joy Zou <joy.zou@....com>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>, "conor+dt@...nel.org"
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Peng Fan
<peng.fan@....com>, "krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>, "shawnguo@...nel.org"
<shawnguo@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>, Ye Li <ye.li@....com>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, "festevam@...il.com"
<festevam@...il.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com"
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>, "s.hauer@...gutronix.de"
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com" <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "ulf.hansson@...aro.org"
<ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>, Clark Wang
<xiaoning.wang@....com>
Subject: RE: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Add i.MX91 platform support
> -----Original Message-----
>
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 18:02:46 +0800, Joy Zou wrote:
> > The design of i.MX91 platform is very similar to i.MX93.
> > Extracts the common parts in order to reuse code.
> >
> > The mainly difference between i.MX91 and i.MX93 is as follows:
> > - i.MX91 removed some clocks and modified the names of some clocks.
> > - i.MX91 only has one A core.
> > - i.MX91 has different pinmux.
> > - i.MX91 has updated to new temperature sensor same with i.MX95.
> >
> > Joy Zou (8):
> > dt-bindings: soc: imx-blk-ctrl: add i.MX91 blk-ctrl compatible
> > arm64: dts: freescale: rename imx93.dtsi to imx91_93_common.dtsi
> > arm64: dts: imx93: move i.MX93 specific part from
> imx91_93_common.dtsi
> > to imx93.dtsi
> > arm64: dts: imx91: add i.MX91 dtsi support
> > arm64: dts: freescale: add i.MX91 11x11 EVK basic support
> > arm64: defconfig: enable i.MX91 pinctrl
> > pmdomain: imx93-blk-ctrl: mask DSI and PXP PD domain register on
> > i.MX91
> > net: stmmac: imx: add i.MX91 support
> >
> > Pengfei Li (1):
> > dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add i.MX91 11x11 evk board
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 6 +
> > .../soc/imx/fsl,imx93-media-blk-ctrl.yaml | 55 +-
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile | 1 +
> > .../boot/dts/freescale/imx91-11x11-evk.dts | 878 ++++++++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91-pinfunc.h | 770 +++++++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91.dtsi | 124 ++
> > .../boot/dts/freescale/imx91_93_common.dtsi | 1215 ++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi | 1412 ++---------------
> > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 +
> > .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c | 2 +
> > drivers/pmdomain/imx/imx93-blk-ctrl.c | 15 +
> > 11 files changed, 3166 insertions(+), 1313 deletions(-) create mode
> > 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91-11x11-evk.dts
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91-pinfunc.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91.dtsi
> > create mode 100644
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91_93_common.dtsi
> >
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >
> My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
> series.
Thanks for your reminder!
Have run DT checks and found this warning. The temperature bindings and driver patch v6 is reviewing.
So add note to the " [PATCH v5 5/9] arm64: dts: imx91: add i.MX91 dtsi support" patch.
Refer to the link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20250407-imx91tmu-v6-0-e48c2aa3ae44@nxp.com/
BR
Joy Zou
>
> Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings are
> fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform maintainer whether
> these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply unless the platform
> maintainer has comments.
>
> If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then make sure
> dt-schema is up to date:
>
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>
>
> This patch series was applied (using b4) to base:
> Base: attempting to guess base-commit...
> Base: tags/v6.16-rc1-6-g8a22d9e79cf0 (best guess, 6/7 blobs matched)
>
> If this is not the correct base, please add 'base-commit' tag (or use b4 which
> does this automatically)
>
> New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/' for
> 20250613100255.2131800-1-joy.zou@....com:
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91-11x11-evk.dtb:
> /soc@...us@...00000/thermal-sensor@...82000: failed to match any
> schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx91-tmu']
>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists