[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9292e561-09bf-4d70-bcb7-f90f9cfbae7b@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 11:22:28 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Greg Chandler <chandleg@...ardsworks.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tulip 21142 panic on physical link disconnect
(please no top posting)
On 6/17/25 11:19, Greg Chandler wrote:
>
> Hmm... I'm wondering if that means it's an alpha-only issue then, which
> would make this a much larger headache than it already is.
> Also thank you for checking, I appreciate you taking the time.
>
> I assume the those interfaces actually work right? (simple ping over
> that interface would be enough) I posted in a subsequent message that
> mine do not appear to at all.
Oh yeah, they work just fine:
udhcpc: broadcasting discover
[ 19.197697] net eth0: Setting full-duplex based on MII#1 link partner
capability of cde1
# ping -c 1 192.168.254.123
PING 192.168.254.123 (192.168.254.123): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.254.123: seq=0 ttl=64 time=2.902 ms
--- 192.168.254.123 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 2.902/2.902/2.902 ms
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.03 sec 39.6 MBytes 33.1 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.07 sec 39.8 MBytes 33.1 Mbits/sec
receiver
>
> My next step is to build that driver as a module, and see if it changes
> anything (I'm doubting it will).
> Then after that go dig up a different adapter, and see if it's the
> network stack or the driver.
>
> I've been hard pressed over the last week to get a lot of diagnosing time.
Let me know if I can run experiments, I can load any kernel version on
this Cobalt Qube2 meaning that bisections are possible.
Good luck!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists