[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHS8izNXHvavBAWyyvwzwFh6CgaBhCnvQvtMsE4B2CHVm206hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 13:14:24 -0700
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>, Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@...gle.com>,
Shivaji Kant <shivajikant@...gle.com>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org,
michael.chan@...adcom.com, pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] eth: bnxt: add netmem TX support
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 2:45 AM Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Use netmem_dma_*() helpers and declare netmem_tx to support netmem TX.
> By this change, all bnxt devices will support the netmem TX.
>
> bnxt_start_xmit() uses memcpy() if a packet is too small. However,
nit: this is slightly inaccurate. memcpy itself is not a problem (via
skb_copy_from_linear_data) is not an issue because I think that's
copying the linear part of the skb. What is really a is
skb_frag_address_safe(). Unreadable skbs have no valid address.
This made me realize that skb_frag_address_safe() is broken :( it
needs this check, similar to skb_frag_address():
```
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index c05057869e08..da03ff71b05e 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -3681,7 +3681,12 @@ static inline void *skb_frag_address(const
skb_frag_t *frag)
*/
static inline void *skb_frag_address_safe(const skb_frag_t *frag)
{
- void *ptr = page_address(skb_frag_page(frag));
+ void *ptr;
+
+ if (!skb_frag_page(frag))
+ return NULL;
+
+ ptr = page_address(skb_frag_page(frag));
if (unlikely(!ptr))
return NULL;
```
I guess I'll send this fix to net.
> netmem packets are unreadable, so memcpy() is not allowed.
> It should check whether an skb is readable, and if an SKB is unreadable,
> it is processed by the normal transmission logic.
>
> netmem TX can be tested with ncdevmem.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
Seems like a straightforward conversion to using the netmem dma
mapping API. I don't see anything concerning/unusualy.
Acked-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
--
Thanks,
Mina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists