netdev - [PATCH net-next 08/10] can: rcar_canfd: Share config code in rcar_canfd_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250618092336.2175168-9-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 11:20:02 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...gutronix.de,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 08/10] can: rcar_canfd: Share config code in rcar_canfd_set_bittiming()

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

The configuration register format for nominal bit timings in CAN-FD mode
and the format for bit timings in CAN mode on CAN-FD controllers with
shared Classical CAN registers are the same.

Restructure the code to make this clear, also reducing kernel size by 80
bytes.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/b7643a3c49777989d02145a85b85cf773ec2123f.1749655315.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
 drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 25 +++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
index c292694ae4d2..9ee49ef57e4f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
@@ -1474,13 +1474,17 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
 	tseg1 = bt->prop_seg + bt->phase_seg1 - 1;
 	tseg2 = bt->phase_seg2 - 1;
 
-	if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD) {
-		/* CAN FD only mode */
+	if ((priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD) || gpriv->info->shared_can_regs) {
 		cfg = (RCANFD_NCFG_NTSEG1(gpriv, tseg1) | RCANFD_NCFG_NBRP(brp) |
 		       RCANFD_NCFG_NSJW(gpriv, sjw) | RCANFD_NCFG_NTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
+	} else {
+		cfg = (RCANFD_CFG_TSEG1(tseg1) | RCANFD_CFG_BRP(brp) |
+		       RCANFD_CFG_SJW(sjw) | RCANFD_CFG_TSEG2(tseg2));
+	}
 
-		rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, RCANFD_CCFG(ch), cfg);
+	rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, RCANFD_CCFG(ch), cfg);
 
+	if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD) {
 		/* Data bit timing settings */
 		brp = dbt->brp - 1;
 		sjw = dbt->sjw - 1;
@@ -1491,21 +1495,6 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
 		       RCANFD_DCFG_DSJW(gpriv, sjw) | RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
 
 		rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, rcar_canfd_f_dcfg(gpriv, ch), cfg);
-	} else {
-		/* Classical CAN only mode */
-		if (gpriv->info->shared_can_regs) {
-			cfg = (RCANFD_NCFG_NTSEG1(gpriv, tseg1) |
-			       RCANFD_NCFG_NBRP(brp) |
-			       RCANFD_NCFG_NSJW(gpriv, sjw) |
-			       RCANFD_NCFG_NTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
-		} else {
-			cfg = (RCANFD_CFG_TSEG1(tseg1) |
-			       RCANFD_CFG_BRP(brp) |
-			       RCANFD_CFG_SJW(sjw) |
-			       RCANFD_CFG_TSEG2(tseg2));
-		}
-
-		rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, RCANFD_CCFG(ch), cfg);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.47.2