[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250618140844.1686882-1-edumazet@google.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 14:08:42 +0000
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 0/2] net: atm: protect dev_lec[] with a mutex
Based on an initial syzbot report.
First patch is adding lec_mutex to address the report.
Second patch protects /proc/net/atm/lec operations.
We probably should delete this driver, it seems quite broken.
Eric Dumazet (2):
net: atm: add lec_mutex
net: atm: fix /proc/net/atm/lec handling
net/atm/lec.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.50.0.rc2.696.g1fc2a0284f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists