[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHS8izOQLvPAE_E2dgMS7-11ZGFK5jmZ7q58LZCnhymhhUj2bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 08:37:05 -0700
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] page_pool: import Jesper's page_pool benchmark
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 3:24 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Does this alleviate your concern? Or do you still see an issue here?
> > There is still a delta between our results, on different
> > hardware/configs but results are in a sane range now.
>
> Now the results a sane and in range :-)
>
Thanks!
Jakub, this patch was marked 'changes requested' for good reason, but
after investigation we found the patch itself is good and the issues
were elsewhere. What do I do here? A resend of v4? Or does this un
'changes requested' as-is?
--
Thanks,
Mina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists