[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56f52836-545a-45aa-8a6b-04aa589c2583@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 11:41:52 -0400
From: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/4] net: axienet: Fix deferred probe loop
On 6/20/25 01:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 04:05:33PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> Upon further investigation, the EPROBE_DEFER loop outlined in [1] can
>> occur even without the PCS subsystem, as described in patch 4/4. The
>> second patch is a general fix, and could be applied even without the
>> auxdev conversion.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250610183459.3395328-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev/
>
> I have no idea what this summary means at all, which isn't a good start
> to a patch series :(
>
> What problem are you trying to solve?
See patch 4/4.
> What overall solution did you come up with?
See patch 4/4.
> Who is supposed to be reviewing any of this?
Netdev. Hence "PATCH net".
And see [1] above for background. I will quote it more-extensively next time.
--Sean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists