[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adc06936-b8e0-4ae4-bcb9-578b38a0e789@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 17:30:35 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] io_uring cmd for tx timestamps
On 6/20/25 15:31, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 6/17/25 4:41 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 16:33:20 -0600 Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>> Sounds like we're good to queue this up for 6.17?
>>>>
>>>> I think so. Can I apply patch 1 off v6.16-rc1 and merge it in to
>>>> net-next? Hash will be 2410251cde0bac9f6, you can pull that across.
>>>> LMK if that works.
>>>
>>> Can we put it in a separate branch and merge it into both? Otherwise
>>> my branch will get a bunch of unrelated commits, and pulling an
>>> unnamed sha is pretty iffy.
>>
>> Like this?
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git timestamp-for-jens
>
> Branch seems to be gone?
Anything against just taking the hash from net-next, turning into
a branch and then merging that? E.g.
https://github.com/isilence/linux.git io_uring-tx-timestamp-net-helpers
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists