[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250620095012.GD194429@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:50:12 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com, sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com,
somnath.kotur@...adcom.com, shenjian15@...wei.com,
salil.mehta@...wei.com, shaojijie@...wei.com, cai.huoqing@...ux.dev,
saeedm@...dia.com, tariqt@...dia.com, louis.peens@...igine.com,
mbloch@...dia.com, manishc@...vell.com, ecree.xilinx@...il.com,
joe@...a.to
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/10] net: ethtool: don't mux RXFH via rxnfc
callbacks
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 01:38:23PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> All drivers have been converted. Stop using the rxnfc fallbacks
> for Rx Flow Hashing configuration.
>
> Joe pointed out in earlier review that in ethtool_set_rxfh()
> we need both .get_rxnfc and .get_rxfh_fields, because we need
> both the ring count and flow hashing (because we call
> ethtool_check_flow_types()). IOW the existing check added
> for transitioning drivers was buggy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists