[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <574038c3-7013-49a4-ba72-2b40fcec9e5e@mojatatu.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 12:31:09 -0300
From: Victor Nogueira <victor@...atatu.com>
To: William Liu <will@...lsroot.io>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, pctammela@...atatu.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, kuba@...nel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org,
dcaratti@...hat.com, savy@...t3mfailure.io, jiri@...nulli.us,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] selftests/tc-testing: Add tests for restrictions
on netem duplication
> Ensure that a duplicating netem cannot exist in a tree with other netems
> in both qdisc addition and change. This is meant to prevent the soft
> lockup and OOM loop scenario discussed in [1].
Can you add a new test case that checks for netem duplicate in 2 different
branches? Something similar to what test case "bf1d" is doing.
> [...]
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/netem.json b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/netem.json
> index 3c4444961488..e46a97e75f4b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/netem.json
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tc-testing/tc-tests/qdiscs/netem.json
> @@ -336,5 +336,46 @@
> "teardown": [
> "$TC qdisc del dev $DUMMY handle 1: root"
> ]
> + },
> + {
> + "id": "d34d",
> + "name": "NETEM test qdisc duplication restriction in qdisc tree",
> + "category": ["qdisc", "netem"],
> + "plugins": {
> + "requires": "nsPlugin"
> + },
> + "setup": [
> + "$IP link set lo up || true",
> + "$TC qdisc add dev lo root handle 1: netem limit 1 duplicate 100%"
It would be better to use dummy instead of lo like the other test cases in
this file.
cheers,
Victor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists