[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <opt6smgzc7evwrme7mulwyqute6enx2hq2vjfjksroz2gzzeir@sy6be73mwnsu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 19:01:44 +0200
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Xuewei Niu <niuxuewei97@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, decui@...rosoft.com, fupan.lfp@...group.com,
haiyangz@...rosoft.com, jasowang@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, kys@...rosoft.com,
leonardi@...hat.com, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, niuxuewei.nxw@...group.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, stefanha@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
wei.liu@...nel.org, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] vsock: Add support for SIOCINQ ioctl
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 09:59:10PM +0800, Xuewei Niu wrote:
>> ACCin hyper-v maintainers and list since I have a question about hyperv
>> transport.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:53:44PM +0800, Xuewei Niu wrote:
>> >Add support for SIOCINQ ioctl, indicating the length of bytes unread in the
>> >socket. The value is obtained from `vsock_stream_has_data()`.
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Xuewei Niu <niuxuewei.nxw@...group.com>
>> >---
>> > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> >index 2e7a3034e965..bae6b89bb5fb 100644
>> >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> >@@ -1389,6 +1389,28 @@ static int vsock_do_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd,
>> > vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
>> >
>> > switch (cmd) {
>> >+ case SIOCINQ: {
>> >+ ssize_t n_bytes;
>> >+
>> >+ if (!vsk->transport) {
>> >+ ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> >+ break;
>> >+ }
>> >+
>> >+ if (sock_type_connectible(sk->sk_type) &&
>> >+ sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
>> >+ ret = -EINVAL;
>> >+ break;
>> >+ }
>> >+
>> >+ n_bytes = vsock_stream_has_data(vsk);
>>
>> Now looks better to me, I just checked transports: vmci and virtio/vhost
>> returns what we want, but for hyperv we have:
>>
>> static s64 hvs_stream_has_data(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
>> {
>> struct hvsock *hvs = vsk->trans;
>> s64 ret;
>>
>> if (hvs->recv_data_len > 0)
>> return 1;
>>
>> @Hyper-v maintainers: do you know why we don't return `recv_data_len`?
>> Do you think we can do that to support this new feature?
>
>Hi Hyper-v maintainers, could you please take a look at this?
>
>Hi Stefano, if no response, can I fix this issue in the next version?
Yep, but let's wait a little bit more.
In that case, please do it in a separate patch (same series is fine)
that we can easily revert/fix if they will find issues later.
Thanks,
Stefano
>
>Thanks,
>Xuewei
>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefano
>>
>> >+ if (n_bytes < 0) {
>> >+ ret = n_bytes;
>> >+ break;
>> >+ }
>> >+ ret = put_user(n_bytes, arg);
>> >+ break;
>> >+ }
>> > case SIOCOUTQ: {
>> > ssize_t n_bytes;
>> >
>> >--
>> >2.34.1
>> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists