[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250624202616.526600-11-kuni1840@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 13:24:16 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 10/15] ipv6: mcast: Remove unnecessary ASSERT_RTNL and comment.
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
Now, RTNL is not needed for mcast code, and what's commented in
ip6_mc_msfget() is apparent by for_each_pmc_socklock(), which has
lockdep annotation for lock_sock().
Let's remove the comment and ASSERT_RTNL() in ipv6_mc_rejoin_groups().
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv6/mcast.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/mcast.c b/net/ipv6/mcast.c
index af322a455346..dc363a6c0b7a 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/mcast.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/mcast.c
@@ -605,10 +605,6 @@ int ip6_mc_msfget(struct sock *sk, struct group_filter *gsf,
if (!ipv6_addr_is_multicast(group))
return -EINVAL;
- /* changes to the ipv6_mc_list require the socket lock and
- * rtnl lock. We have the socket lock, so reading the list is safe.
- */
-
for_each_pmc_socklock(inet6, sk, pmc) {
if (pmc->ifindex != gsf->gf_interface)
continue;
@@ -2880,8 +2876,6 @@ static void ipv6_mc_rejoin_groups(struct inet6_dev *idev)
{
struct ifmcaddr6 *pmc;
- ASSERT_RTNL();
-
mutex_lock(&idev->mc_lock);
if (mld_in_v1_mode(idev)) {
for_each_mc_mclock(idev, pmc)
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists