[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250625150628.00002255@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 15:06:28 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>
CC: <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <edward.cree@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>, "Alison
Schofield" <alison.schofield@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 01/22] cxl: Add type2 device basic support
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 15:13:34 +0100
<alejandro.lucero-palau@....com> wrote:
> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>
> Differentiate CXL memory expanders (type 3) from CXL device accelerators
> (type 2) with a new function for initializing cxl_dev_state and a macro
> for helping accel drivers to embed cxl_dev_state inside a private
> struct.
>
> Move structs to include/cxl as the size of the accel driver private
> struct embedding cxl_dev_state needs to know the size of this struct.
>
> Use same new initialization with the type3 pci driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
Hi Alejandro,
A few really minor comments inline.
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c | 12 +-
> drivers/cxl/core/memdev.c | 32 +++++
> drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 1 +
> drivers/cxl/core/regs.c | 1 +
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 97 +--------------
> drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h | 85 +------------
> drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h | 21 ----
> drivers/cxl/pci.c | 17 +--
> include/cxl/cxl.h | 226 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/cxl/pci.h | 23 ++++
> tools/testing/cxl/test/mem.c | 3 +-
> 11 files changed, 303 insertions(+), 215 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/cxl/cxl.h
> create mode 100644 include/cxl/pci.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> index d72764056ce6..d78f6039f997 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c
> @@ -1484,23 +1484,21 @@ int cxl_mailbox_init(struct cxl_mailbox *cxl_mbox, struct device *host)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_mailbox_init, "CXL");
>
> -struct cxl_memdev_state *cxl_memdev_state_create(struct device *dev)
> +struct cxl_memdev_state *cxl_memdev_state_create(struct device *dev, u64 serial,
> + u16 dvsec)
> {
> struct cxl_memdev_state *mds;
> int rc;
>
> - mds = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mds), GFP_KERNEL);
> + mds = devm_cxl_dev_state_create(dev, CXL_DEVTYPE_CLASSMEM, serial,
> + dvsec, struct cxl_memdev_state, cxlds,
> + true);
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> index 3ec6b906371b..9cc4337cacfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/cdev.h>
> #include <linux/uuid.h>
> #include <linux/node.h>
Is node still used in here? If the includes was just for
struct access_coordinates then that is now gone from this file.
> +#include <cxl/cxl.h>
> #include <cxl/event.h>
> #include <cxl/mailbox.h>
> #include "cxl.h"
> @@ -357,87 +358,6 @@ struct cxl_security_state {
> struct kernfs_node *sanitize_node;
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> index 785aa2af5eaa..0d3c67867965 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> @@ -924,19 +927,19 @@ static int cxl_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> return rc;
> pci_set_master(pdev);
>
> - mds = cxl_memdev_state_create(&pdev->dev);
> + dvsec = pci_find_dvsec_capability(pdev, PCI_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> + CXL_DVSEC_PCIE_DEVICE);
> + if (!dvsec)
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> + "Device DVSEC not present, skip CXL.mem init\n");
Could use pci_warn(pdev, "..."); Not particularly important.
> +
> + mds = cxl_memdev_state_create(&pdev->dev, pci_get_dsn(pdev), dvsec);
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists