[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250625210014.eqajfqiqkmycgoy4@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:14 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: nathan.lynch@....com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: packing: Include necessary headers
On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 08:50:44AM -0500, Nathan Lynch via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Nathan Lynch <nathan.lynch@....com>
>
> packing.h uses ARRAY_SIZE(), BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(), min(), max(), and
> sizeof_field() without including the headers where they are defined,
> potentially causing build failures.
>
> Fix this in packing.h and sort the result.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathan.lynch@....com>
> ---
> include/linux/packing.h | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/packing.h b/include/linux/packing.h
> index 0589d70bbe0434c418f41b842f92b3300a107762..20ae4d452c7bb4069eb625ba332d617c2a840193 100644
> --- a/include/linux/packing.h
> +++ b/include/linux/packing.h
> @@ -5,8 +5,12 @@
> #ifndef _LINUX_PACKING_H
> #define _LINUX_PACKING_H
>
> -#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/array_size.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/build_bug.h>
> +#include <linux/minmax.h>
> +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
>
> #define GEN_PACKED_FIELD_STRUCT(__type) \
> struct packed_field_ ## __type { \
>
> ---
> base-commit: 19272b37aa4f83ca52bdf9c16d5d81bdd1354494
> change-id: 20250624-packing-includes-5d544b1efd86
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Nathan Lynch <nathan.lynch@....com>
>
>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
I assume this patch is not necessary for stable kernels, I haven't
noticed any build breakage report in the packing integrations thus far.
Netdev maintainers, can you pick this patch up via net-next? All past
contributions to packing went through networking. Let me see if I can
revive it in patchwork.
pw-bot: under-review
Nathan, if netdev maintainers don't respond within 24 hours, can you
please post a v2 of this patch explicitly targeting the net-next tree,
as per Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists