[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c33dd3e-373a-41b3-b67a-1b89ce1ab1b5@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 15:27:30 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 00/15] ipv6: Drop RTNL from mcast.c and
anycast.c
On 6/24/25 10:24 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
>
> This is a prep series for RCU conversion of RTM_NEWNEIGH, which needs
> RTNL during neigh_table.{pconstructor,pdestructor}() touching IPv6
> multicast code.
>
> Currently, IPv6 multicast code is protected by lock_sock() and
> inet6_dev->mc_lock, and RTNL is not actually needed.
>
> In addition, anycast code is also in the same situation and does not
> need RTNL at all.
>
> This series removes RTNL from net/ipv6/{mcast.c,anycast.c} and finally
> removes setsockopt_needs_rtnl() from do_ipv6_setsockopt().
I went through the whole series I could not find any obvious bug.
Still this is not trivial matter and I recently missed bugs in similar
changes, so let me keep the series in PW for a little longer, just in
case some other pair of eyes would go over it ;)
BTW @Kuniyuki: do you have a somewhat public todo list that others could
peek at to join this effort?
Thanks!
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists