[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250626081156.475c14d2@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 08:11:56 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@...il.com>, Donald Hunter
<donald.hunter@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon
Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon
Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Boris
Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, Willem
de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Neal
Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@...dia.com>,
Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>, Dragos
Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>, Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@...dia.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>, Alexander Lobakin
<aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/17] psp: base PSP device support
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 10:25:11 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Preferable over the following?
>
> struct psphdr {
> u8 nexthdr;
> u8 hdrlen;
> u8 crypt_offset;
>
> u8 sample:1;
> u8 drop:1;
> u8 version:4;
> u8 vc_present:1;
> u8 reserved:1;
>
> __be32 spi;
> __be64 iv;
> __be64 vc[]; /* optional */
> };
>
> I suppose that has an endianness issue requiring
> variants with __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD and
> __BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD.
Right, this part. Always gives me pause :(
> > > This makes sense with a single physical device plus optional virtual
> > > (vlan, bonding, ..) devices.
> > >
> > > It may also be possible for a single physical device (with single
> > > device key) to present multiple PFs and/or VFs. In that case, will
> > > there be multiple struct psp_dev, or will one PF be the "main".
> >
> > AFAIU we have no ability to represent multi-PCIe function devices
> > in the kernel model today. So realistically I think psp_dev per
> > function and then propagate the rotation events.
>
> IDPF does support multiple "vports" (num_alloc_vports), and with that
> struct net_device, from a single BDF.
Upstream? If yes then I'm very bad at reviewing code :D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists