netdev - Re: [PATCH v6] dt-bindings: net: Convert socfpga-dwmac bindings to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250626234119.GA1398428-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 18:41:19 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@...era.com>, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
	maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
	alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mun Yew Tham <mun.yew.tham@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] dt-bindings: net: Convert socfpga-dwmac bindings to
 yaml

On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:19:13AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:58:44 -0700 Matthew Gerlach wrote:
> > Convert the bindings for socfpga-dwmac to yaml. Since the original
> > text contained descriptions for two separate nodes, two separate
> > yaml files were created.
> 
> Hi DT Maintainers! Thanks for reviewing the IPQ5018 bindings!
> In case my pings are helpful, this is the next oldest patch in netdev
> queue. The v4 seem to have gotten some feedback:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250609163725.6075-1-matthew.gerlach@altera.com/

No need to ping us. Like netdev, you can check the PW queue:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/list/

In any case, we're a bit behind ATM.


It looks like we have 2 competing conversions of this binding. This one 
and this one which I reviewed:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250624191549.474686-1-dinguyen@kernel.org/

Looks like there are some differences which need resolving, so I revoke 
my review. Will follow-up separately on both.

Rob