[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a57e0de4-3d54-4626-a6ae-a661fd36d130@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 11:01:24 +0530
From: Chintan Vankar <c-vankar@...com>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
CC: <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <rogerq@...nel.org>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <mwalle@...nel.org>, <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
<jpanis@...libre.com>, <danishanwar@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw-nuss: Fix skb size by
accounting for skb_shared_info
Hello Siddharth,
On 25/06/25 19:07, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 04:57:25PM +0530, Chintan Vankar wrote:
>
> Hello Chintan,
>
>> While transitioning from netdev_alloc_ip_align to build_skb, memory for
>
> nitpick: Add parantheses when referring to functions:
> netdev_alloc_ip_align()
> build_skb()
>
>> skb_shared_info was not allocated. Fix this by including
>
> Enclose structures within double quotes and preferably refer to them
> in the context of an "skb":
>
> ...memory for the "skb_shared_info" member of an "skb" was not allocated...
>
>> sizeof(skb_shared_info) in the packet length during allocation.
>>
>> Fixes: 8acacc40f733 ("net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Add minimal XDP support")
>
>> Signed-off-by: Chintan Vankar <c-vankar@...com>
>> ---
>>
>> This patch is based on the commit '9caca6ac0e26' of origin/main branch of
>> Linux-net repository.
>>
>> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
>> index f20d1ff192ef..3905eec0b11e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
>> @@ -857,6 +857,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *am65_cpsw_build_skb(void *page_addr,
>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>>
>> len += AM65_CPSW_HEADROOM;
>> + len += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
>
> This could be added to the previous line itself:
>
> len += AM65_CPSW_HEADROOM + SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
>
>>
>> skb = build_skb(page_addr, len);
>> if (unlikely(!skb))
>
> Thank you for finding the bug and fixing it.
>
Thank you for reviewing patch. I have posted v2 by addressing your
comments at:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250626051226.2418638-1-c-vankar@ti.com/
Regards,
Chintan.
> Regards,
> Siddharth.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists