netdev - Re: [PATCH v17 16/22] cxl/region: Factor out interleave ways setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0a73070b-b7b0-4697-9fb6-b43a4e6834b6@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 16:05:20 -0700
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
 alejandro.lucero-palau@....com
Cc: linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 dan.j.williams@...el.com, edward.cree@....com, davem@...emloft.net,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
 Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>, Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>,
 Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 16/22] cxl/region: Factor out interleave ways setup



On 6/27/25 2:13 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 15:13:49 +0100
> <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>>
>> Region creation based on Type3 devices is triggered from user space
>> allowing memory combination through interleaving.
>>
>> In preparation for kernel driven region creation, that is Type2 drivers
>> triggering region creation backed with its advertised CXL memory, factor
>> out a common helper from the user-sysfs region setup for interleave ways.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>> Reviewed-by: Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@....com>
> As a heads up, this code changes a fair bit in Dan's ACQUIRE() series
> that may well land before this.  Dave can ask for whatever resolution he
> wants when we get to that stage!
> 
> 
We probably want to rebase on top of that. Dan has an immutable branch in cxl.git for the ACQUIRE() patch. Or are you talking about the outstanding CXL changes?