netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/12] bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aGLYEBoBk6BI3TPx@mini-arch>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:31:44 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
To: Jordan Rife <jordan@...fe.io>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/12] bpf: tcp: Make sure iter->batch always
 contains a full bucket snapshot

On 06/30, Jordan Rife wrote:
> Require that iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot. This
> invariant is important to avoid skipping or repeating sockets during
> iteration when combined with the next few patches. Before, there were
> two cases where a call to bpf_iter_tcp_batch may only capture part of a
> bucket:
> 
> 1. When bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch() returns -ENOMEM.
> 2. When more sockets are added to the bucket while calling
>    bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(), making the updated batch size
>    insufficient.
> 
> In cases where the batch size only covers part of a bucket, it is
> possible to forget which sockets were already visited, especially if we
> have to process a bucket in more than two batches. This forces us to
> choose between repeating or skipping sockets, so don't allow this:
> 
> 1. Stop iteration and propagate -ENOMEM up to userspace if reallocation
>    fails instead of continuing with a partial batch.
> 2. Try bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch() with GFP_USER just as before, but if
>    we still aren't able to capture the full bucket, call
>    bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch() again while holding the bucket lock to
>    guarantee the bucket does not change. On the second attempt use
>    GFP_NOWAIT since we hold onto the spin lock.
> 
> I did some manual testing to exercise the code paths where GFP_NOWAIT is
> used and where ERR_PTR(err) is returned. I used the realloc test cases
> included later in this series to trigger a scenario where a realloc
> happens inside bpf_iter_tcp_batch and made a small code tweak to force
> the first realloc attempt to allocate a too-small batch, thus requiring
> another attempt with GFP_NOWAIT. Some printks showed both reallocs with
> the tests passing:
> 
> Jun 27 00:00:53 crow kernel: again GFP_USER
> Jun 27 00:00:53 crow kernel: again GFP_NOWAIT
> Jun 27 00:00:53 crow kernel: again GFP_USER
> Jun 27 00:00:53 crow kernel: again GFP_NOWAIT
> 
> With this setup, I also forced each of the bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch
> calls to return -ENOMEM to ensure that iteration ends and that the
> read() in userspace fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@...fe.io>
> Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>

Looks more approachable now, thank you!

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>