[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PA4PR02MB8169B60435DC350BF0AD49E1BD46A@PA4PR02MB8169.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:54:37 +0000
From: Paul Geurts <paul.geurts@...drive-technologies.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: "mgreer@...malcreek.com" <mgreer@...malcreek.com>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch"
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org"
<kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "robh@...nel.org"
<robh@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Martijn de
Gouw <martijn.de.gouw@...drive-technologies.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: net/nfc: ti,trf7970a: Add
ti,rx-gain-reduction-db option
> On 27/06/2025 09:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 04:12:41PM +0200, Paul Geurts wrote:
>>> Add option to reduce the RX antenna gain to be able to reduce the
>>> sensitivity.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Geurts <paul.geurts@...drive-technologies.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/ti,trf7970a.yaml | 7
>>> +++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/ti,trf7970a.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/ti,trf7970a.yaml
>>> index d0332eb76ad2..5f49bd9ac5e6 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/ti,trf7970a.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/ti,trf7970a.yaml
>>> @@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ properties:
>>> description: |
>>> Regulator for supply voltage to VIN pin
>>>
>>> + ti,rx-gain-reduction-db:
>>
>> I'll add db unit to the dtschema.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> BTW, I found your patchset only via patchwork, because Gmail flagged your entire v3 and others as spam. You might need to check your SMTP setup. I see DMARC failure from google in the headers:
>
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
> spf=pass (google.com: domain of
> srs0=m3n1=zj=prodrive-technologies.com=paul.geurts@...nel.org designates 147........ as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="SRS0=m3n1=ZJ=prodrive-technologies.com=paul.geurts@...nel.org";
> dmarc=fail (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=QUARANTINE) header.from=prodrive-technologies.com
>
>
> Maybe you sent via kernel.org something with different address? Actually this looks like that - your From does not match kernel.org at all.
> Rules are quite strict recently and for example you cannot use non-kernel.org SMTP server for kernel.org accounts (see kernel users wiki).
>
> Anyway, likely any other future patches or such patches to other people to end up in spam as well.
Thanks for the heads up! I'll contact our IT dept. to look into that. And thanks for the review!
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists