[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250630171938.1d2a0e44@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 17:19:38 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
Cc: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexander
Loktionov <Alexander.Loktionov@...antia.com>, David VomLehn
<vomlehn@...as.net>, Dmitry Bezrukov <Dmitry.Bezrukov@...antia.com>, Pavel
Belous <Pavel.Belous@...antia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: atlantic: Rename PCI driver struct to end in
_driver
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:09:34 +0200 Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> If you do
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_pci_func.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_pci_func.c
> index ed5231dece3f..2ee5900337bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_pci_func.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_pci_func.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static void aq_pci_free_irq_vectors(struct aq_nic_s *self)
> pci_free_irq_vectors(self->pdev);
> }
>
> -static int aq_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +static int __init aq_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> const struct pci_device_id *pci_id)
> {
> struct net_device *ndev;
>
> this is buggy; so it's justified that you get:
>
> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: aq_pci_driver+0x8 (section: .data) -> aq_pci_probe (section: .init.text)
> ERROR: modpost: Section mismatches detected.
>
> . However if the driver struct is named "aq_pci_ops", the warning is
> suppressed due to
>
> /* symbols in data sections that may refer to any init/exit sections */
> if (match(fromsec, PATTERNS(DATA_SECTIONS)) &&
> match(tosec, PATTERNS(ALL_INIT_SECTIONS, ALL_EXIT_SECTIONS)) &&
> match(fromsym, PATTERNS("*_ops", "*_probe", "*_console")))
> return 0;
>
> in scripts/mod/modpost.c.
Now it makes perfect sense :) I see you already reposted with a better
message. IIF you have more such patches I'd use the word "suppressed" -
something along the lines "the section mismatch warnings are suppressed
if the function is assigned to a struct with a name ending in _ops".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists