[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGO0whOGhE4LmVo2@shredder>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 13:13:22 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Cc: Aiden Yang <ling@...dove.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
MoeDove NOC <noc@...dove.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] net: gre: IPv6 link-local multicast is silently dropped
(Regression)
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 01:54:58PM +0200, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 05:49:36PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > + Guillaume
> >
> > Report is here: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANR=AhRM7YHHXVxJ4DmrTNMeuEOY87K2mLmo9KMed1JMr20p6g@mail.gmail.com/
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 02:40:27PM +0800, Aiden Yang wrote:
> > > This report details a regression in the Linux kernel that prevents
> > > IPv6 link-local all-nodes multicast packets (ff02::1) from being
> > > transmitted over a GRE tunnel. The issue is confirmed to have been
> > > introduced between kernel versions 6.1.0-35-cloud-amd64 (working) and
> > > 6.1.0-37-cloud-amd64 (failing) on Debian 12 (Bookworm).
> >
> > Apparently 6.1.0-35-cloud-amd64 is v6.1.137 and 6.1.0-37-cloud-amd64 is
> > v6.1.140. Probably started with:
> >
> > a51dc9669ff8 gre: Fix again IPv6 link-local address generation.
> >
> > In v6.1.139.
> >
> > It skips creating an IPv6 multicast route for some ipgre devices. Can
> > you try the following diff?
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> > index ba2ec7c870cc..d0a202d0d93e 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> > @@ -3537,12 +3537,10 @@ static void addrconf_gre_config(struct net_device *dev)
> > * case). Such devices fall back to add_v4_addrs() instead.
> > */
> > if (!(dev->type == ARPHRD_IPGRE && *(__be32 *)dev->dev_addr == 0 &&
> > - idev->cnf.addr_gen_mode == IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_EUI64)) {
> > + idev->cnf.addr_gen_mode == IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_EUI64))
> > addrconf_addr_gen(idev, true);
> > - return;
> > - }
> > -
> > - add_v4_addrs(idev);
> > + else
> > + add_v4_addrs(idev);
> >
> > if (dev->flags & IFF_POINTOPOINT)
> > addrconf_add_mroute(dev);
>
> I believe that should fix the problem indeed. But, to me, the root
> cause is that addrconf_gre_config() doesn't call addrconf_add_dev().
>
> Ido, What do you think of something like the following (untested,
> hand-written) diff:
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_IPGRE)
> static void addrconf_gre_config(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct inet6_dev *idev;
>
> ASSERT_RTNL();
>
> - idev = ipv6_find_idev(dev);
> - if (IS_ERR(idev)) {
> - pr_debug("%s: add_dev failed\n", __func__);
> - return;
> - }
> + idev = addrconf_add_dev(dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(idev))
> + return;
>
> /* Generate the IPv6 link-local address using addrconf_addr_gen(),
> * unless we have an IPv4 GRE device not bound to an IP address and
> * which is in EUI64 mode (as __ipv6_isatap_ifid() would fail in this
> * case). Such devices fall back to add_v4_addrs() instead.
> */
> if (!(*(__be32 *)dev->dev_addr == 0 &&
> idev->cnf.addr_gen_mode == IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_EUI64)) {
> addrconf_addr_gen(idev, true);
> return;
> }
>
> add_v4_addrs(idev);
> -
> - if (dev->flags & IFF_POINTOPOINT)
> - addrconf_add_mroute(dev);
> }
> #endif
>
> This way, we would create the multicast route and also respect
> disable_ipv6. That would bring GRE yet a bit closer to normal IPv6
> lladdr generation code.
Makes sense. So you will submit it to net and extend gre_ipv6_lladdr.sh
to test for the presence of a multicast route?
>
> Note: this diff is based on net-next, but, without all the extra
> context lines, a real patch would probably apply to both net and
> next-next and could be backported to -stable.
>
> > Guillaume, AFAICT, after commit d3623dd5bd4e ("ipv6: Simplify link-local
> > address generation for IPv6 GRE.") in net-next an IPv6 multicast route
> > will be created for every ip6gre device, regardless of IFF_POINTOPOINT.
> > It should restore the behavior before commit e5dd729460ca ("ip/ip6_gre:
> > use the same logic as SIT interfaces when computing v6LL address"). We
> > can extend gre_ipv6_lladdr.sh to test this once the fix is in net-next.
>
> Yes, I fully agree.
>
> Long term, I'd really like to remove these special GRE and SIT cases
> (SIT certainly has the same problems we're currently fixing on GRE).
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists