[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250702064822.3443-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 14:48:22 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org,
michael.chan@...adcom.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] bnxt_en: eliminate the compile warning in bnxt_request_irq due to CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
I received a kernel-test-bot report[1] that shows the
[-Wunused-but-set-variable] warning. Since the previous commit I made, as
the 'Fixes' tag shows, gives users an option to turn on and off the
CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL, the issue then can be discovered and reproduced with
GCC specifically.
Like Simon and Jakub suggested, use fewer #ifdefs which leads to fewer
bugs.
[1]
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c: In function 'bnxt_request_irq':
>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:10703:9: warning: variable 'j' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
10703 | int i, j, rc = 0;
| ^
Fixes: 9b6a30febddf ("net: allow rps/rfs related configs to be switched")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202506282102.x1tXt0qz-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
---
v2
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250629003616.23688-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
1. use a better approach with fewer #ifdefs (Simon, Jakub)
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 869580b6f70d..f1ff87c18b71 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -11538,11 +11538,9 @@ static void bnxt_free_irq(struct bnxt *bp)
static int bnxt_request_irq(struct bnxt *bp)
{
+ struct cpu_rmap *rmap = NULL;
int i, j, rc = 0;
unsigned long flags = 0;
-#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
- struct cpu_rmap *rmap;
-#endif
rc = bnxt_setup_int_mode(bp);
if (rc) {
@@ -11563,15 +11561,15 @@ static int bnxt_request_irq(struct bnxt *bp)
int map_idx = bnxt_cp_num_to_irq_num(bp, i);
struct bnxt_irq *irq = &bp->irq_tbl[map_idx];
-#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
- if (rmap && bp->bnapi[i]->rx_ring) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL) &&
+ rmap && bp->bnapi[i]->rx_ring) {
rc = irq_cpu_rmap_add(rmap, irq->vector);
if (rc)
netdev_warn(bp->dev, "failed adding irq rmap for ring %d\n",
j);
j++;
}
-#endif
+
rc = request_irq(irq->vector, irq->handler, flags, irq->name,
bp->bnapi[i]);
if (rc)
--
2.41.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists