netdev - Re: [PATCH mlx5-next] net/mlx5: fs, fix RDMA TRANSPORT init cleanup flow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250702144106.GF41770@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 15:41:06 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
	Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@...dia.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next] net/mlx5: fs, fix RDMA TRANSPORT init cleanup
 flow

On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 01:24:04PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@...dia.com>
> 
> Failing during the initialization of root_namespace didn't cleanup
> the priorities of the namespace on which the failure occurred.
> 
> Properly cleanup said priorities on failure.
> 
> Fixes: e6746b0c7423 ("net/mlx5: fs, add multiple prios to RDMA TRANSPORT steering domain")

Hi Leon and Patrisious,

Maybe there has been a rebase, there is something weird on my side, or for
some reason it doesn't matter. But I see a different hash in mlx5-next [1].

Fixes: 52931f55159e ("net/mlx5: fs, add multiple prios to RDMA TRANSPORT steering domain")

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git/log/?h=mlx5-next

> Signed-off-by: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>

Otherwise, LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>