[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGSa3bgijdi+KqcK@pop-os.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 19:35:09 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sched: acp_api: no longer acquire RTNL in
tc_action_net_exit()
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 01:30:06PM +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> tc_action_net_exit() got an rtnl exclusion in commit
> a159d3c4b829 ("net_sched: acquire RTNL in tc_action_net_exit()")
>
> Since then, commit 16af6067392c ("net: sched: implement reference
> counted action release") made this RTNL exclusion obsolete.
I am not sure removing RTNL is safe even we have action refcnt.
For example, are you sure tcf_action_offload_del() is safe to call
without RTNL?
What are you trying to improve here?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists