[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <686a96ed46da5_3ad0f32941e@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2025 11:31:57 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@...il.com>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@...dia.com>,
Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>,
Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>,
Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>,
Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@...dia.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/19] psp: base PSP device support
Daniel Zahka wrote:
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>
> Add a netlink family for PSP and allow drivers to register support.
>
> The "PSP device" is its own object. This allows us to perform more
> flexible reference counting / lifetime control than if PSP information
> was part of net_device. In the future we should also be able
> to "delegate" PSP access to software devices, such as *vlan, veth
> or netkit more easily.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Zahka <daniel.zahka@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Minor points only
> +/**
> + * struct psp_dev - PSP device struct
> + * @main_netdev: original netdevice of this PSP device
> + * @ops: driver callbacks
> + * @caps: device capabilities
> + * @drv_priv: driver priv pointer
> + * @lock: instance lock, protects all fields
> + * @refcnt: reference count for the instance
> + * @id: instance id
> + * @config: current device configuration
> + *
> + * @rcu: RCU head for freeing the structure
> + */
> +struct psp_dev {
> + struct net_device *main_netdev;
> +
> + struct psp_dev_ops *ops;
> + struct psp_dev_caps *caps;
> + void *drv_priv;
not used?
> +
> + struct mutex lock;
> + refcount_t refcnt;
> +
> + u32 id;
> +
> + struct psp_dev_config config;
> +
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct psp_dev_caps - PSP device capabilities
> + */
> +struct psp_dev_caps {
> + /**
> + * @versions: mask of supported PSP versions
> + * Set this field to 0 to indicate PSP is not supported at all.
> + */
> + u32 versions;
> +};
> +
> +#define PSP_V0_KEY 16
> +#define PSP_V1_KEY 32
Above two not used? And these and the following are are KEY_LEN
> +#define PSP_MAX_KEY 32
Powered by blists - more mailing lists