[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJUM86t-hYC_W5KS1gn+NOFP4zoaS+99Cpvx+tOO=mxoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 02:35:35 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...udflare.com,
Lee Valentine <lvalentine@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] tcp: Consider every port when connecting
with IP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE
On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 2:13 AM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com> wrote:
> I was wondering what the maintainers' outlook on this change is:
>
> Does this sound acceptable?
> Or should we start looking in a different direction?
>
Long weekend, and a big number of submissions while we were away.
Let me take a look.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists