lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aG7iCRECnB3VdT_2@xps>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 14:41:29 -0700
From: Xiang Mei <xmei5@....edu>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jhs@...atatu.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
	security@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/sched: sch_qfq: Fix race condition on
 qfq_aggregate

On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 01:19:20PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed,  9 Jul 2025 11:06:22 -0700 Xiang Mei wrote:
> > Reported-by: Xiang Mei <xmei5@....edu>
> > Fixes: 462dbc9101ac ("pkt_sched: QFQ Plus: fair-queueing service at DRR cost")
> > Signed-off-by: Xiang Mei <xmei5@....edu>
> 
> Reported-by is for cases where the bug is reported by someone else than

This bug's fixing is a little special since I am both the person who reported 
it and the patch author. I may need a "Reported-by" tag mentioning me since I 
exploited this bug in Google's bug bounty program (kerneCTF) and they will 
verify the Reported-by tag to make sure I am the person found the bug.

> the author. And please do *not* send the patches as a reply in a thread.
> I already asked you not to do it once.

I am so sorry that I misunderstood it. Now it's clear, we should always 
not use "-in-reply-to".

> -- 
> pw-bot: cr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ