[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aG7iCRECnB3VdT_2@xps>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 14:41:29 -0700
From: Xiang Mei <xmei5@....edu>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jhs@...atatu.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
security@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/sched: sch_qfq: Fix race condition on
qfq_aggregate
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 01:19:20PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 11:06:22 -0700 Xiang Mei wrote:
> > Reported-by: Xiang Mei <xmei5@....edu>
> > Fixes: 462dbc9101ac ("pkt_sched: QFQ Plus: fair-queueing service at DRR cost")
> > Signed-off-by: Xiang Mei <xmei5@....edu>
>
> Reported-by is for cases where the bug is reported by someone else than
This bug's fixing is a little special since I am both the person who reported
it and the patch author. I may need a "Reported-by" tag mentioning me since I
exploited this bug in Google's bug bounty program (kerneCTF) and they will
verify the Reported-by tag to make sure I am the person found the bug.
> the author. And please do *not* send the patches as a reply in a thread.
> I already asked you not to do it once.
I am so sorry that I misunderstood it. Now it's clear, we should always
not use "-in-reply-to".
> --
> pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists