netdev - [PATCH v5 bpf-next 03/12] bpf: tcp: Get rid of st_bucket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250709230333.926222-4-jordan@jrife.io>
Date: Wed,  9 Jul 2025 16:03:23 -0700
From: Jordan Rife <jordan@...fe.io>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jordan Rife <jordan@...fe.io>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 03/12] bpf: tcp: Get rid of st_bucket_done

Get rid of the st_bucket_done field to simplify TCP iterator state and
logic. Before, st_bucket_done could be false if bpf_iter_tcp_batch
returned a partial batch; however, with the last patch ("bpf: tcp: Make
sure iter->batch always contains a full bucket snapshot"),
st_bucket_done == true is equivalent to iter->cur_sk == iter->end_sk.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@...fe.io>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 8dfb87be422e..50ef605dfa01 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -3020,7 +3020,6 @@ struct bpf_tcp_iter_state {
 	unsigned int end_sk;
 	unsigned int max_sk;
 	struct sock **batch;
-	bool st_bucket_done;
 };
 
 struct bpf_iter__tcp {
@@ -3043,8 +3042,10 @@ static int tcp_prog_seq_show(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta,
 
 static void bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter)
 {
-	while (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
-		sock_gen_put(iter->batch[iter->cur_sk++]);
+	unsigned int cur_sk = iter->cur_sk;
+
+	while (cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
+		sock_gen_put(iter->batch[cur_sk++]);
 }
 
 static int bpf_iter_tcp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_tcp_iter_state *iter,
@@ -3161,7 +3162,7 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
 	 * one by one in the current bucket and eventually find out
 	 * it has to advance to the next bucket.
 	 */
-	if (iter->st_bucket_done) {
+	if (iter->end_sk && iter->cur_sk == iter->end_sk) {
 		st->offset = 0;
 		st->bucket++;
 		if (st->state == TCP_SEQ_STATE_LISTENING &&
@@ -3173,7 +3174,6 @@ static struct sock *bpf_iter_tcp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
 
 	iter->cur_sk = 0;
 	iter->end_sk = 0;
-	iter->st_bucket_done = true;
 
 	sk = tcp_seek_last_pos(seq);
 	if (!sk)
@@ -3321,10 +3321,8 @@ static void bpf_iter_tcp_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 			(void)tcp_prog_seq_show(prog, &meta, v, 0);
 	}
 
-	if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk) {
+	if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
 		bpf_iter_tcp_put_batch(iter);
-		iter->st_bucket_done = false;
-	}
 }
 
 static const struct seq_operations bpf_iter_tcp_seq_ops = {
-- 
2.43.0