netdev - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: Convert Marvell Armada NETA and BM to DT schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a965baaa-c4e9-4d99-9143-466b11bc19f8@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:46:11 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn
 <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Marcin Wojtas <marcin.s.wojtas@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: Convert Marvell Armada NETA and BM to
 DT schema

On 7/3/25 12:26 AM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> index 5d2a7a8d3ac6..741b545e3ab0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ patternProperties:
>    "^(pciclass|pinctrl-single|#pinctrl-single|PowerPC),.*": true
>    "^(pl022|pxa-mmc|rcar_sound|rotary-encoder|s5m8767|sdhci),.*": true
>    "^(simple-audio-card|st-plgpio|st-spics|ts),.*": true
> +  "^pool[0-3],.*": true

The 'DO NOT ADD NEW PROPERTIES TO THIS LIST' comment just above this
block is a bit scaring, even if the list has been indeed updated a few
times. @Rob: can you please confirm this chunk is intended?

Also I understand you want this patch to go through the net-next tree,
could you please confirm?

Thanks,

/P