[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ef83a1e-38c3-41bb-8fd2-c28565f2a0ba@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:16:19 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
Cc: Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@...cinc.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
quic_kkumarcs@...cinc.com, quic_linchen@...cinc.com,
quic_leiwei@...cinc.com, quic_pavir@...cinc.com,
quic_suruchia@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add NSS clock
controller for IPQ5424 SoC
On 7/11/25 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 08:28:15PM +0800, Luo Jie wrote:
>> NSS clock controller provides the clocks and resets to the networking
>> blocks such as PPE (Packet Process Engine) and UNIPHY (PCS) on IPQ5424
>> devices.
>>
>> Add the compatible "qcom,ipq5424-nsscc" support based on the current
>> IPQ9574 NSS clock controller DT binding file. ICC clocks are always
>> provided by the NSS clock controller of IPQ9574 and IPQ5424, so add
>> interconnect-cells as required DT property.
>>
>> Also add master/slave ids for IPQ5424 networking interfaces, which is
>> used by nss-ipq5424 driver for providing interconnect services using
>> icc-clk framework.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
>> ---
[...]
>> clocks:
>> items:
>> @@ -57,6 +61,7 @@ required:
>> - compatible
>> - clocks
>> - clock-names
>> + - '#interconnect-cells'
>
> You just made this required for everyone. Again, that's an ABI change.
In this case it's actually valid, but should be a separate fixup change
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists