[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mo6dtede26twve7umo6tu6q3tajxetc2nxgy3et5mhdoxfuwxe@br4vg5h73k5k>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:29:16 +0200
From: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@...xmox.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] ipv6: add `force_forwarding` sysctl to
enable per-interface forwarding
On 10.07.2025 15:26, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>On 7/7/25 11:43 AM, Gabriel Goller wrote:
>> It is currently impossible to enable ipv6 forwarding on a per-interface
>> basis like in ipv4. To enable forwarding on an ipv6 interface we need to
>> enable it on all interfaces and disable it on the other interfaces using
>> a netfilter rule. This is especially cumbersome if you have lots of
>> interface and only want to enable forwarding on a few. According to the
>> sysctl docs [0] the `net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding` enables forwarding
>> for all interfaces, while the interface-specific
>> `net.ipv6.conf.<interface>.forwarding` configures the interface
>> Host/Router configuration.
>>
>> Introduce a new sysctl flag `force_forwarding`, which can be set on every
>> interface. The ip6_forwarding function will then check if the global
>> forwarding flag OR the force_forwarding flag is active and forward the
>> packet.
>>
>> To preserver backwards-compatibility reset the flag (on all interfaces)
>> to 0 if the net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding flag is set to 0.
>>
>> Add a short selftest that checks if a packet gets forwarded with and
>> without `force_forwarding`.
>>
>> [0]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@...xmox.com>
>
>Does not apply cleanly anymore, please rebase and repost.
>
>Also a few nits below...
Will do.
>> @@ -857,6 +859,9 @@ static void addrconf_forward_change(struct net *net, __s32 newf)
>> idev = __in6_dev_get_rtnl_net(dev);
>> if (idev) {
>> int changed = (!idev->cnf.forwarding) ^ (!newf);
>> + /* Disabling all.forwarding sets 0 to force_forwarding for all interfaces */
>> + if (newf == 0)
>> + WRITE_ONCE(idev->cnf.force_forwarding, newf);
>
>You could use:
>
> WRITE_ONCE(idev->cnf.force_forwarding, 0);
>
Agree, thanks!
>>
>> WRITE_ONCE(idev->cnf.forwarding, newf);
>> if (changed)
>> @@ -5719,6 +5724,7 @@ static void ipv6_store_devconf(const struct ipv6_devconf *cnf,
>> array[DEVCONF_ACCEPT_UNTRACKED_NA] =
>> READ_ONCE(cnf->accept_untracked_na);
>> array[DEVCONF_ACCEPT_RA_MIN_LFT] = READ_ONCE(cnf->accept_ra_min_lft);
>> + array[DEVCONF_FORCE_FORWARDING] = READ_ONCE(cnf->force_forwarding);
>> }
>>
>> static inline size_t inet6_ifla6_size(void)
>> @@ -6747,6 +6753,76 @@ static int addrconf_sysctl_disable_policy(const struct ctl_table *ctl, int write
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static void addrconf_force_forward_change(struct net *net, __s32 newf)
>> +{
>> + struct net_device *dev;
>> + struct inet6_dev *idev;
>> +
>> + for_each_netdev(net, dev) {
>> + idev = __in6_dev_get_rtnl_net(dev);
>> + if (idev) {
>> + int changed = (!idev->cnf.force_forwarding) ^ (!newf);
>> +
>> + WRITE_ONCE(idev->cnf.force_forwarding, newf);
>> + if (changed) {
>> + inet6_netconf_notify_devconf(dev_net(dev), RTM_NEWNETCONF,
>> + NETCONFA_FORCE_FORWARDING,
>> + dev->ifindex, &idev->cnf);
>> + }
>
>Brakets not needed for the above statement. Either drop them or move the
>WRITE_ONCE() inside the if ()
Agree, thanks!
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipv6_force_forwarding.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipv6_force_forwarding.sh
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..62adc9d4afc9
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipv6_force_forwarding.sh
>> @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
>> +#!/bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +#
>> +# Test IPv6 force_forwarding interface property
>> +#
>> +# This test verifies that the force_forwarding property works correctly:
>> +# - When global forwarding is disabled, packets are not forwarded normally
>> +# - When force_forwarding is enabled on an interface, packets are forwarded
>> +# regardless of the global forwarding setting
>> +
>> +source lib.sh
>> +
>> +cleanup() {
>> + cleanup_ns $ns1 $ns2 $ns3
>> +}
>> +
>> +trap cleanup EXIT
>> +
>> +setup_test() {
>> + # Create three namespaces: sender, router, receiver
>> + setup_ns ns1 ns2 ns3
>> +
>> + # Create veth pairs: ns1 <-> ns2 <-> ns3
>> + ip link add name veth12 type veth peer name veth21
>> + ip link add name veth23 type veth peer name veth32
>> +
>> + # Move interfaces to namespaces
>> + ip link set veth12 netns $ns1
>> + ip link set veth21 netns $ns2
>> + ip link set veth23 netns $ns2
>> + ip link set veth32 netns $ns3
>> +
>> + # Configure interfaces
>> + ip -n $ns1 addr add 2001:db8:1::1/64 dev veth12
>> + ip -n $ns2 addr add 2001:db8:1::2/64 dev veth21
>> + ip -n $ns2 addr add 2001:db8:2::1/64 dev veth23
>> + ip -n $ns3 addr add 2001:db8:2::2/64 dev veth32
>
>The above will trigger DaD...
>
>> +
>> [snip[
>> + # Test 2: With force_forwarding enabled, ping should succeed
>> + ip netns exec $ns2 sysctl -qw net.ipv6.conf.veth21.force_forwarding=1
>> + ip netns exec $ns2 sysctl -qw net.ipv6.conf.veth23.force_forwarding=1
>> +
>> + if ip netns exec $ns1 ping -6 -c 1 -W 2 2001:db8:2::2 &>/dev/null; then
>> + echo "PASS: force_forwarding enabled forwarding"
>
>... I'm wondering if it could sometimes race with the ping and cause
>sporadic failures? Possible using 'nodad' option for address creation
>could help.
Good catch!
I'll add `nodad` to the addresses.
>/P
Thanks for the review!
I'll send a v6 soon!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists