[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e12178f-e5f8-4202-948b-bdc421d5a361@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:55:19 +0200
From: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
bridge@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 nf-next 3/3] netfilter: nft_chain_filter: Add bridge
double vlan and pppoe
On 7/9/25 12:02 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com> wrote:
>> + if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, VLAN_HLEN))
>> + break;
>> + vhdr = (struct vlan_hdr *)(skb->data);
>> + offset = VLAN_HLEN;
>> + outer_proto = skb->protocol;
>> + proto = vhdr->h_vlan_encapsulated_proto;
>> + skb_set_network_header(skb, offset);
>> + skb->protocol = proto;
>
> Why is skb->protocol munged? Also applies to the previous patch,
> I forgot to ask.
In the previous patch in nf_ct_bridge_pre(), indeed, no need to munge
skb->protocol. So I'll change that.
But in nft_do_chain_bridge() it is needed in the case of matching 'ip
saddr', 'ip daddr', 'ip6 saddr' or 'ip6 daddr'. I suspect all ip/ip6
matches are suffering.
So still matching is something like:
tcp dport 8080 counter name "check"
But no match when:
ip saddr 192.168.1.1 tcp dport 8080 counter name "check"
After munging skb->protocol, I do get the match.
I haven't found where yet, but It seems nft is checking skb->protocol,
before it tries to match the ip(6) saddr/daddr.
And to answer a question in the other patch: this issue is found by
using my script bridge_fastpath.sh. It first checks the connection,
conntrack and nft-chain are functional in all testcases. So, it tests
the functionality of the patches in this patch-set. I want to improve
the script on a few more issues and then send a non-rfc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists