[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whxjOfjufO8hS27NGnRhfkZfXWTXp1ki=xZz3VPWikMgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 12:42:54 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Networking for v6.16-rc6 (follow up)
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 at 12:30, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> So that "Oh, it worked this time" has been tainted by past experience.
> Will do several more boots now in the hope that it's gone for good.
Yeah, no.
There's still something wrong. The second boot looked fine, but then
starting chrome had a 15s delay, and when that cleared I got a
notification that 'gnome-settings-daemon' had crashed.
And the backtrace is basically identical to the one I saw with
gsd-screensaver-proxy.
So it's some socket that times out, but reverting these three
a215b5723922 netlink: make sure we allow at least one dump skb
a3c4a125ec72 netlink: Fix rmem check in netlink_broadcast_deliver().
ae8f160e7eb2 netlink: Fix wraparounds of sk->sk_rmem_alloc.
did *not* fix it.
Were there any other socket changes perhaps?
I just looked, and gsd-screensaver-proxy seems to use a regular Unix
domain stream socket. Maybe not related to netlink, did unix domain
sockets end up with some similar changes?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists