netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: net: rfkill-gpio: document reset-gpios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21d8f6388b98ec0fe8662606a3f1c3181466917d.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 09:14:49 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Shengyu Qu <wiagn233@...look.com>, Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>, 
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,  Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: net: rfkill-gpio: document
 reset-gpios

On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 12:37 +0800, Shengyu Qu wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> What is blocking this patch to get merged? I'm seeing more 5G modules 
> need this to work correctly, for example, FM350.
> 

I guess I have no idea, fell through the cracks and so far nobody cared
enough?

DT folks, what tree should this kind of patch go through? I guess I can
take it through wireless-next with other rfkill changes? Or should it go
through some DT tree?

johannes