lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Xkn0k1T1WExEErBWNX2KpV5LgS9_QyNobWmlUUjcpihDZ5oJrCtZyvuXfiTnrGiOGQnKVQatnw0suv3voQl_6lMrncCe5NdO3NaQliF16mc=@willsroot.io>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 16:51:39 +0000
From: William Liu <will@...lsroot.io>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, victor@...atatu.com, pctammela@...atatu.com, pabeni@...hat.com, stephen@...workplumber.org, dcaratti@...hat.com, savy@...t3mfailure.io, jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v5 1/2] net/sched: Restrict conditions for adding duplicating netems to qdisc tree

On Friday, July 11th, 2025 at 10:55 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, 08 Jul 2025 16:43:26 +0000 William Liu wrote:
> 
> > netem_enqueue's duplication prevention logic breaks when a netem
> > resides in a qdisc tree with other netems - this can lead to a
> > soft lockup and OOM loop in netem_dequeue, as seen in [1].
> > Ensure that a duplicating netem cannot exist in a tree with other
> > netems.
> 
> 
> We already had one regression scare this week, so given that Cong
> is not relenting I'll do the unusual thing of parking this fix in
> net-next. It will reach Linus during the merge window, hopefully
> the <2 week delay is not a big deal given how long we've taken already.

If this is going to net-next, will this still be a candidate for backporting like other recent net/sched bug-fixes? Or will this only be considered fixed starting 6.17 onwards?

Best,
William

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ